OPEN-CHANNEL HYDRAULICS:  LECTURE 063 - VEGETATED CHANNELS


1. VEGETATED CHANNELS


1.01
Vegetated channels, or channels lined with vegetation, are used in places where it is not advisable to line the channel with a rigid boundary.
1.02
In recent years, as environmental concerns have developed, vegetated channels have become a popular alternative to channel lined with rigid materials.

Fig. 01

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


1.03
This table shows a comparison of vegetated channels and rigid-boundary channels.

Property Vegetated channels Rigid-boundary channels
Infiltration/exfiltration Moderate to high None
Habitat function Good to very good Poor
Filtering of contaminants Very good to excellent None
Design velocity Low to medium High to very high
Maintenance cost Moderate to high Low
Aesthetics Good Poor to fair

1.04
The capability for channel infiltration is one of the main reasons for the selection of a vegetated channel in lieu of a rigid-boundary channel.
1.05
A vegetated channel can feed to groundwater, which a rigid-boundary channel cannot.

Fig. 02

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


1.06
In many cases, groundwater replenishment may be important enough to warrant the choice of a vegetated channel.
1.07
Habitat function is a design consideration in cases where biodiversity may be threatened.
1.08
Generally, for a given design discharge, vegetated channels feature lower velocities and, therefore, larger cross sections.
1.09
Maintenance costs are substantially higher than those of rigid-boundary channels.
1.10
Most people consider a vegetated channel to be pleasing to the eye, as opposed to a concrete-lined channel.

Fig. 03

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.

Fig. 04

Rio Santa Catarina, Monterrey, Mexico.


1.11
In summary, while a rigid-boundary channel focuses on conveyance effectiveness, a vegetated channel takes into account a host of environmental concerns, such as groundwater replenishment, contaminant filtering, biodiversity, and aesthetics.
1.12
Vegetated channels are increasingly being used in hydraulic engineering.
1.13
This table shows values of absolute roughness k and Manning's n for various types of vegetated channels.

Type of cover Roughness k (m) Manning's n
Lawn 0.06 0.025
Grass 0.20 0.035
Grassland 0.25 0.040
Grass with shrubs 0.30 0.045
Herbaceous vegetation 0.40 0.050
Irregular flood plains 0.80 0.065
Highly irregular flood plains 1.00 0.085


2. GABION-LINED CHANNELS


2.01
Gabions are bank-stabilization structures consisting of mesh baskets filled with small rip rap.
2.02
A gabion structure may consist of several baskets.

Fig. 06

Gabion structure during construction.


2.03
Since the rip rap is enclosed with wire mesh, gabions have a high resistance to erosion.

Fig. 05

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


2.04
Vegetation is able to grow within gabion structures.

Fig. 07

Gabion channel with vegetation.


2.05
Planting vegetation within gabions improves habitat, decreases flow velocity, and enhances the aesthetic appeal of the channel.
2.06
This table shows a comparison of gabion-lined channels and rigid-boundary channels.

Property Gabion-lined channels Rigid-boundary channels
Infiltration/exfiltration Moderate None
Habitat function Moderate to good Poor
Filtering of contaminants Good to very good None
Design velocity Medium High to very high
Maintenance cost Moderate Low
Aesthetics Moderate to good Poor to fair


2.07
Gabion structures provide a compromise between the good conveyance properties of rigid-boundary channels and the environmental friendliness of vegetated channels.


2.08
Gabion structures provide moderate rates of infiltration, moderate habitat function, medium design velocities, and moderate maintenance costs and aesthetics.


2.09
Gabions are also a compromise between riprap-lined channels and rigid-boundary channels.


2.10
When the same size rocks are used in gabions and rip rap, design velocities for gabions are 3 to 4 times higher than for rip rap.


2.11
The procedure for placing gabions consists of:

1. Assembling the gabion mats.

Fig. 08

Assembling the gabion mats.

2. Placing the mats, wiring them, and filling the units with rock.

Fig. 09

Placing the mats and filling the units with rock.

3. Closing and wiring down the lids.

Fig. 10

Gabion lids.


2.12
There are several gabion manufacturers in the market.


2.13
Design velocities for gabion structures vary with the type of structure and the manufacturer's recommendations.
2.14
This table shows values of Manning's n for various types of channel lining.

Type of lining Manning's n
Concrete (trowel finish) 0.013
Concrete (float finish) 0.015
Gunite 0.020
Flagstone 0.023
Gabions 0.028
Rip rap 0.050


3. NATURAL BANK STABILIZATION


3.01
Natural bank stabilization includes vegetative procedures to strengthen channel banks against erosion.
3.02
For proper habitat functioning in natural bank stabilization, three temporal wetting zones are considered:

1. Permanently wetted zone

2. Intermittently wetted zone, and

3. Event wetted zone, or flood plain.


3.03
Wattles and fascines are used in the permanently wetted zone.
3.04
Wattles consist of a row of stakes hammered into the ground.

Fig. 11

Bank protection with wattles.

Fig. 20

Bank protection with wattle fencing.


3.05
The stakes are braided with flexible strong brushwood.
3.06
Fascine sausages are cylindrical bundles of willow rods with diameters of 10 to 15 cm, used for streambank protection and bank stabilization.
3.07
They are manufactured with flexible brushwood and anchored with stakes of about 1 m length.

Fig. 21

Bank protection with fascines, Templin Channel, Brandenburg, Germany.


3.08
Fascine rolls are similar to fascine sausages, with a diameter of 25 to 40 cm.
3.09
Weighted fascines are cylindrical bodies with a diameter of 0.8 to 1.2 m.

Fig. 12

Weighted fascines.


3.10
They consist of a 15 to 20 cm thick coat of brush wood and a core of rough gravel or crushed rock.
3.11
Grass-lined channels, also called swales or bioswales, are used in urban drainage.

Fig. 22

Grass-lined channel or bioswale.


3.12
The intermittent zone is transitional between the permanently wetted zone and the flood plain.
3.13
Cattails are placed in the intermittent zone.
3.14
Various types of arrangements are used in the floodplain zone, including:

1. Lawns.

2. Lawn seeding.

Fig. 13

Seeding of channel banks.

3. Vegetative bank stabilization.

4. Woods, including brush mattresses, live staking and small trees and shrubs.

Fig. 14

Brush mattress in channel bank.

Fig. 15

Live stakes after installation.

Fig. 16

Live stakes sometime after installation.

Fig. 17

Live stakes 2-5 yr after installation.

Fig. 18

Established live staking.

Fig. 19

Bank protection with trees and shrubs.


3.15
This table shows values of maximum permissible velocity and critical tractive stress for various types of vegetative bank stabilization.

Vegetative bank stabilization Maximum permissible velocity (m/s) Critical tractive stress (N/m2)
Lawn 1.5-1.8 15-30
Fascine sausage 2.5-3.0 60-70
Fascine roll 3.0-3.5 100-150
Weighted fascine 2.5-3.0 60-100
Brush mattress 2.5-3.5 150-300
Live staking in rip rap - 140 +
Willows, alder - 80-140
Gabions 1.8-6.7 80-140

3.16
Design velocities for vegetated channels do not exceed maximum permissible velocities.
3.17
Design velocities are calculated with the Manning equation.


      1
 v = 
 R2/3 S1/2 
      n

Eq. 1


3.18
Design tractive stresses should not exceed the critical tractive stresses.
3.19
Design tractive stresses are calculated with the bottom shear stress equation.


 τo = γ R S 

Eq. 2


Fig. 01

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


Fig. 02

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


Fig. 03

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


Fig. 04

Rio Santa Catarina, Monterrey, Mexico.


Fig. 05

Rio Atoyac, Oaxaca, Mexico.


Fig. 06

Bank protection with gabions.


Fig. 07

Gabion channel with vegetation.


Fig. 08

Assembling the gabion mats.


Fig. 09

Placing and filling the units with rocks.


Fig. 10

Gabion lids.


Fig. 11

Bank protection with wattles.


Fig. 12

Weighted fascines.


Fig. 13

Seeding of channel banks.


Fig. 14

Completed brush mattress in channel bank.


Fig. 15

Live stakes after installation.


Fig. 16

Live stakes sometime after installation.


Fig. 17

Live stakes 2-5 yr after installation.


Fig. 18

Established live staking.


Fig. 19

Bank protection with trees and shrubs.


Fig. 20

Bank protection with wattle fencing.


Fig. 21

Bank protection with fascines, Templin Channel, Brandenburg, Germany.


Fig. 22

Grass-lined channel or bioswale (NRCS)


Narrator: Victor M. Ponce

Music: Fernando Oñate

Editor: Flor Pérez


Copyright © 2011

Visualab Productions

All rights reserved