CIVE 445 - ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

CHAPTER 5C: HYDROLOGY OF MIDSIZE CATCHMENTS, TR-55 METHOD

5.3  TR-55 METHOD

  • TR-55 is a collection of simplified procedures developed by the NRCS (ex SCS).

  • It consists of two main procedures:

    1. graphical,

    2. tabular.

  • The graphical method calculates peak flows, for catchments with time of concentration in the range 0.1-10 hr.

  • The tabular method calculates flood hydrographs, for catchments with time of concentration in the range 0.1-2 hr.

  • The graphical method is described here.  

    TR-55 storm, catchment, and runoff parameters

    • Rainfall in TR-55 is described in terms of total rainfall depth and one of four type rainfall distributions: I, IA, II, and III.

    • These type distributions are shown in Page 189.

    • The location for these type distributions is shown in Page 189.

    • The duration is 24 hr.

    • This constant duration was selected because most rainfall data is reported on a 24-hr basis.

    • Rainfall intensities corresponding to durations shorter than 24 hr are contained within the SCS distributions.

    • For instance, if a 10-yr 24-hr rainfall is used, the 1-hr period with the most intense rainfall corresponds to the 10-yr 1-hr rainfall depth.

    • TR-55 uses the CN method to abstract total rainfall.

    • TR-55 is intended to be used for midsize basins, greater than 2.5 km2, with time of concentration up to 10 hours.

    • Therefore, TR-55 includes procedures to determine the time of concentration for the following three types of surface flow:

      1. overland flow,

      2. shallow concentrated flow, and

      3. channel flow.

     

    Selection of runoff curve number CN

    • TR-55 defines two types of areas in urban catchments:

      1. pervious,

      2. impervious

    • Runoff curve numbers are calculated by area weighing.

    • Impervious areas are of two types:

      1. connected

      2. unconnected

    • Connected impervious areas are those in which runoff flows directly into the drainage system, or where runoff (from the impervious area) flows over a pervious area as shallow concentrated flow as in a grass-lined swale.

    • Unconnected impervious areas are those in which runoff (from the impervious area) flows over a pervious area (as overland flow) before it enters the drainage system.  

       

    • Table 5-2(a) shows urban runoff curve numbers for different classes of pervious areas and connected impervious areas.

    • Table 5-2(b), Table 5-2(c), and Table 5-2(d) show runof curve numbers for agricultural lands, forest, and semiarid rangelands, respectively.

    • Figure 5-16 is used in lieu of Table 2 if the impervious area percentages or the pervious area classes are other than those shown in the table (table shows only typical values).

    • When the impervious areas are unconnected, Fig. 5-16 is used in cases where the total impervious area exceeds 30% of the catchment.

    • Fig. 5-16 gives a composite CN as a function of percent imperviousness and pervious area CN.

    • Figure 5-17 is used to determine the composite CN when all or portions of the impervious areas are unconnected and the total impervious area is less than 30%.

    • Fig. 5-17 gives a composite CN as a function of percent imperviousness, ratio of unconnected impervious area to total impervious area, and pervious area CN.
     

    Travel time and time of concentration

    • For any reach or subreach, travel time is defined as the ratio of flow length to average flow velocity.

    • At any given point in the catchment, the time of concentration is the sum of travel times through the upstream reaches.

    • For overland flow, TR-55 uses the following formula for travel time:

      tt = [0.007 (nL) 0.8] / [P2 0.5 S 0.4]

    • in which tt = travel time in hours, n = Manning's n, L = flow length in ft, P2 = 2-yr 24-hr rainfall in inches, and S = average land slope, in ft/ft.

    • In SI units, the travel time is:

      tt = [0.0288 (nL) 0.8] / [P2 0.5 S 0.4]

    • in which L = flow length in m, P2 = 2-yr 24-hr rainfall in cm, and S = average land slope, in m/m.

    • Table 5-11 shows values of Manning's n applicable to overland flow.

  •  

     

    • Overland flow lengths more than 300 ft lead to a form of surface flow referred to as shallow concentrated flow.

    • For shallow concentrated flow, the average flow velocity is determined from Figure 5-18.

     

    TR-55 graphical method

    • The TR-55 graphical method calculates peak discharge based on the concept of unit peak flow.

    • The unit peak flow is the peak flow per unit area per unit runoff depth.

    • Unit peak flow is a function of

      1. time of concentration,

      2. ratio of initial abstraction to total rainfall, and

      3. storm type.

    • Peak discharge is calculated by the following formula:

      Qp = qu A Q F

    • in which:

      • Qp = peak discharge (L3T-1)

      • qu = unit peak flow (T-1)

      • A = area, (L2)

      • Q = runoff depth (L)

      • F = surface storage correction factor (dimensionless).

    • It is first necessary to evaluate the catchment flow type (overland flow, shallow concentrated flow, or channel flow).

    • The time time of concentration is evaluated with formulas or graphs.

    • The runoff curve number CN is determined from tables or figures.

    • A flood frequency is selected.

    • The rainfall depth P for the 24-hr duration and chosen frequency is determined from depth-duration-frequency maps.

    • With P and CN, the runoff Q is determined by the curve number method.

    • The initial abstraction Ia is estimated as 20% of the potential maximum retention S (standard value of NRCS initial abstraction):

      Ia = 0.2 S

    • S is mapped to CN by the Mockus mapping equation:

      S = (1000/CN) - 10

    • from which the initial abstraction in inches, is:

      Ia = (200/CN) - 2

    • The initial abstraction in cm, is:

      Ia = (508/CN) - 5.08

    • The surface storage correction factor F is obtained from Table 5-12.

    • With time of concentration tc, initial abstraction ratio Ia/P, and storm type (I, IA, II, or III), the unit peak flow is determined from the TR-55 graphical charts.


      Type I

      Type IA

      Type II

      Type III

    • Interpolation can be used for values of Ia/P other than those shown.

    • For values out or range, the maximum or minimum value shown should be used.

    • To obtain unit peak flow in SI units (m3s-1km-2cm-1), the values of the graphs are multiplied by the conversion factor 0.0043.

    • Peak discharge is calculated by the following formula:

      Qp = qu A Q F

    • TR-55 method is limited to:

      • CN greater than 40,

      • time of concentration between 0.1 and 10 hours, and

      • surface storage areas throughout the catchment and covering at most 5% of it.

     

    Assessment of TR-55 graphical method

    • Time of concentration accounts for btoh runoff concentration and diffusion.

    • The unit-peak-flow graphs show that unit peak flow decreases with time of concentration.

    • This implies that diffusion increases with catchment size and time of concentration.

    • This is the same finding than Creager's (See Creager curves)

    • The parameter Ia/P is related to the catchment's abstractive properties.

    • The factor F reduces the peak discharge to account for additional runoff diffusion caused by surface storage features typical of low-relief catchments (ponds and swamps).

    • The climate and geographical location is accounted for by the storm type distributions.

    • Thus, the TR-55 methos accounts for hydrologic abstraction, runoff concentration and diffusion, climate and geographical location, and depression storage.

    • The TR-55 method is an extension of the rational method to midsize catchments.

    • The unit peak flow qu (peak discharge per unit area per unit runoff depth) is similar to the runoff coefficient C (peak discharge per unit drainage area per unit rainfall intensity).

    • Unlike the rational method, the TR-55 method is applicable to midsize catchments.  

     

    Comparison with the rational method

    • Assume A = 1 mi2, tc= 1 hr, C = 0.95 (high).

    • A calculation with the rational method gives: Qp = C I A = 613 cfs.

    • A calculation with the TR-55 method, using the lowest possible value of abstraction (Ia/P = 0.10, roughly equivalent to C = 0.95), gives the following results:

      • For storm type I: Qp = 200 cfs.

      • For storm type IA: Qp = 108 cfs.

      • For storm type II: Qp = 360 cfs.

      • For storm type III: Qp = 295 cfs.

    • This example shows the effect of the storm type on the calculated peak discharge by the TR-55 method.

    • The type II storm is the most intense, while the type IA storm is the least intense.

    • This example shows that th TR-55 method gives generally lower values than the rational method.

    • This is to be expected, since the TR-55 method is accounting for runoff diffusion in a better way thatn the rational method.

    • The graphs were developed by running the TR-20 computer model many times.

    • Conclusion: Use TR-55 method to develop peak discharges for midsize catchments.

     
    030110